HostWM vs STLINK — price, size and safety, side by side
WM (Ethereum) vs STLINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WM vs STLINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WM | STLINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9998 | $11.42 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $4.05M | $1.03M |
| Liquidity | $5.00M | $5.38M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 711 | 513 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WM measures ~3.9× the 24h volume of STLINK
What the data says
WM
Wrapped M is M^0's portable institutional dollar — the bridged representation of the M stablecoin, which is itself issued against T-bill collateral under a framework designed for institutional minters. The deployment 0x437cc33344a0b27a429f795ff6b469c72698b291 is the wrapped mint on Ethereum; our August 19, 2026 snapshot reads $5.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing: wM is a claim on M, and M is a claim on a collateral book operated under M^0's rules — so the holder sits two layers from the T-bills, one more than a USDC holder does. The design's pitch is interoperability (M is meant to power bespoke stablecoins); the cost is that the custody chain is longer than the marketing implies.
STLINK
Staked LINK is LINK deposited into Chainlink's native staking — the token that secures the oracle network's economic guarantees and earns emissions for doing it. The deployment 0xb8b295df2cd735b15be5eb419517aa626fc43cd5 is the staking receipt; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: stLINK trades LINK's oracle-usage thesis with a staking yield on top and a liquidity discount underneath — the staked form exits slower than the base asset, and the yield is emissions-funded rather than fee-funded, which makes it a bet on the network's token economics holding their value, not on fees it collects.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WM or STLINK?
By tracked market cap: WM (Ethereum) measures — and STLINK (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WM or STLINK?
On the contract checks we publish: WM (Ethereum) grades B and STLINK (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WM and STLINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WM at 0.00% and STLINK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WM vs RYYWM vs FKBWM vs CRDWM vs RDKSTLINK vs RYYSTLINK vs FKBSTLINK vs CRDSTLINK vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.