HostSTLINK vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
STLINK (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
STLINK vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| STLINK | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11.42 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.03M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $5.38M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 513 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~324× the liquidity of STLINK
- RDK measures ~2,794× the 24h volume of STLINK
What the data says
STLINK
Staked LINK is LINK deposited into Chainlink's native staking — the token that secures the oracle network's economic guarantees and earns emissions for doing it. The deployment 0xb8b295df2cd735b15be5eb419517aa626fc43cd5 is the staking receipt; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: stLINK trades LINK's oracle-usage thesis with a staking yield on top and a liquidity discount underneath — the staked form exits slower than the base asset, and the yield is emissions-funded rather than fee-funded, which makes it a bet on the network's token economics holding their value, not on fees it collects.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STLINK or RDK?
By tracked market cap: STLINK (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STLINK or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: STLINK (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STLINK and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show STLINK at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
STLINK vs RYYSTLINK vs FKBSTLINK vs CRDSTLINK vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.