Open app

UST vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side

UST (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

USTA

$0.005215
UST (Portal) on Solana
Trade UST
vs

FKBB

$1.05
Fukabu on Base
Trade FKB

UST vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
UST −1.21%  ·  FKB 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
USTFKB
Price$0.005215$1.05
Market cap$46.24K
24h volume$42.28$2.45B
Liquidity$152.79$2.19B
FDV$46.24K
Holders7,898
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

UST

One detail on UST didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.

On the trading data, UST shows thin liquidity of $153 and 7,898 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. The number worth sitting with is that $153 of depth against a market cap of about $46.24K — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: UST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 7,898 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.

Full UST safety read →

FKB

Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.

What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.

Full FKB safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, UST or FKB?

By tracked market cap: UST (Solana) measures $46.24K and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, UST or FKB?

On the contract checks we publish: UST (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have UST and FKB performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show UST at −1.21% and FKB at 0.00%.

More comparisons

UST vs RYYUST vs CRDUST vs RDKUST vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.