Open app

UST vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

UST (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

USTA

$0.005215
UST (Portal) on Solana
Trade UST
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

UST vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
UST −1.21%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
USTCRD
Price$0.005215$2.13K
Market cap$46.24K
24h volume$42.28$4.03B
Liquidity$152.79$1.99B
FDV$46.24K
Holders7,898
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

UST

One detail on UST didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.

On the trading data, UST shows thin liquidity of $153 and 7,898 wallets holding as of 2026-09-16. The number worth sitting with is that $153 of depth against a market cap of about $46.24K — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: UST reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 7,898 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.

Full UST safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, UST or CRD?

By tracked market cap: UST (Solana) measures $46.24K and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, UST or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: UST (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have UST and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show UST at −1.21% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

UST vs RYYUST vs FKBUST vs RDKUST vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.