HostUSDAT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
USDAT (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USDAT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-07 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USDAT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $855.20K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $9.30M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 162 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~187× the liquidity of USDAT
- RDK measures ~3,375× the 24h volume of USDAT
What the data says
USDAT
USDat is Ethena and Anchorage's GENIUS-compliant dollar — the stablecoin built specifically to fit the US stablecoin law's rails, issued through a federally-chartered crypto bank rather than a foreign issuer. The deployment 0x23238f20b894f29041f48d88ee91131c395aaa71 is the Ethereum mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $9.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note: GENIUS-compliant is a regulatory shape, not a risk verdict — it means the reserve structure (T-bills, qualified custodian, redemption terms) is defined by the same law that governs every US-compliant stable, which makes USDAT's backing more legible than most but no more guaranteed. What it buys Ethena is a US-legal distribution path for the stable stack that made USDe; what it buys a holder is boring, verifiable reserves.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDAT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: USDAT (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDAT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: USDAT (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDAT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-07 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USDAT at +0.03% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDAT vs RYYUSDAT vs FKBUSDAT vs CRDUSDAT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-07→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.