HostUSDAT vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
USDAT (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USDAT vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-07 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USDAT | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $855.20K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $9.30M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 162 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~235× the liquidity of USDAT
- FKB measures ~2,860× the 24h volume of USDAT
What the data says
USDAT
USDat is Ethena and Anchorage's GENIUS-compliant dollar — the stablecoin built specifically to fit the US stablecoin law's rails, issued through a federally-chartered crypto bank rather than a foreign issuer. The deployment 0x23238f20b894f29041f48d88ee91131c395aaa71 is the Ethereum mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $9.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note: GENIUS-compliant is a regulatory shape, not a risk verdict — it means the reserve structure (T-bills, qualified custodian, redemption terms) is defined by the same law that governs every US-compliant stable, which makes USDAT's backing more legible than most but no more guaranteed. What it buys Ethena is a US-legal distribution path for the stable stack that made USDe; what it buys a holder is boring, verifiable reserves.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDAT or FKB?
By tracked market cap: USDAT (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDAT or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: USDAT (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDAT and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-07 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USDAT at +0.03% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDAT vs RYYUSDAT vs CRDUSDAT vs RDKUSDAT vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-07→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.