HostTRUNK vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
TRUNK (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
TRUNK vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| TRUNK | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03367 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $949.71K | — |
| 24h volume | $514.40 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $567.81K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $949.71K | — |
| Holders | 3,250 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~3,069× the liquidity of TRUNK
- RDK measures ~5,611,372× the 24h volume of TRUNK
What the data says
TRUNK
Elephant Money Stable — TRUNK — is the stablecoin of the Elephant Money protocol, bridged to Solana through Wormhole at mint 9mV4WUukVsva5wYcYW4veo34CNDiF44sh3Ji65JNdvh5. The September 16, 2026 snapshot records about $568 thousand of tracked liquidity, a market capitalization near $950 thousand, and roughly 3,250 holders on the Solana side.
The honest version of this page needs the history on the table: Elephant Money suffered a major exploit in 2022 — tens of millions drained through a flash-loan-assisted manipulation of its bonding mechanics — and TRUNK has spent periods trading below its $1 target since. The protocol rebuilt and the token survives, which says something real about persistence; but a stablecoin's whole product is the peg, and "has depegged before under stress" is the single most relevant fact about one.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TRUNK or RDK?
By tracked market cap: TRUNK (Solana) measures $949.71K and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TRUNK or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: TRUNK (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TRUNK and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TRUNK at −1.47% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TRUNK vs RYYTRUNK vs FKBTRUNK vs CRDTRUNK vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.