HostTRUNK vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
TRUNK (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
TRUNK vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| TRUNK | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03367 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $949.71K | — |
| 24h volume | $514.40 | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $567.81K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $949.71K | — |
| Holders | 3,250 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~2,984× the liquidity of TRUNK
- CCV measures ~5,329,251× the 24h volume of TRUNK
What the data says
TRUNK
Elephant Money Stable — TRUNK — is the stablecoin of the Elephant Money protocol, bridged to Solana through Wormhole at mint 9mV4WUukVsva5wYcYW4veo34CNDiF44sh3Ji65JNdvh5. The September 16, 2026 snapshot records about $568 thousand of tracked liquidity, a market capitalization near $950 thousand, and roughly 3,250 holders on the Solana side.
The honest version of this page needs the history on the table: Elephant Money suffered a major exploit in 2022 — tens of millions drained through a flash-loan-assisted manipulation of its bonding mechanics — and TRUNK has spent periods trading below its $1 target since. The protocol rebuilt and the token survives, which says something real about persistence; but a stablecoin's whole product is the peg, and "has depegged before under stress" is the single most relevant fact about one.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TRUNK or CCV?
By tracked market cap: TRUNK (Solana) measures $949.71K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TRUNK or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: TRUNK (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TRUNK and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show TRUNK at −1.47% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TRUNK vs RYYTRUNK vs FKBTRUNK vs CRDTRUNK vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.