Open app

TIBBIR vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side

TIBBIR (Base) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

TIBBIRB

$0.1183
Ribbita on Base
Trade TIBBIR
vs

RDKB

$2.07K
Rudake on Base
Trade RDK

TIBBIR vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
TIBBIR 0.00%  ·  RDK 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
TIBBIRRDK
Price$0.1183$2.07K
Market cap
24h volume$844.65K$2.89B
Liquidity$250.87K$1.74B
FDV
Holders
Age (days)1161
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

TIBBIR

TIBBIR — Ribbita — is a token from the Virtuals Protocol ecosystem on Base: one of the agent-launched assets that came out of that platform's agent-economy push. The contract 0xa4a2e2ca3fbfe21aed83471d28b6f65a233c6e00 is what our scan tracks: $251 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 10, 2026.

The honest read on agent-ecosystem tokens: they are doubly levered to the AI-agent narrative — to their own project's delivery and to attention staying inside the Virtuals economy at all. Liquidity is real here, which separates it from the long tail of agent tokens, but the cohort as a whole trades on narrative first and fundamentals later.

Full TIBBIR safety read →

RDK

Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.

Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.

Full RDK safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, TIBBIR or RDK?

By tracked market cap: TIBBIR (Base) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, TIBBIR or RDK?

On the contract checks we publish: TIBBIR (Base) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have TIBBIR and RDK performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show TIBBIR at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.

More comparisons

TIBBIR vs RYYTIBBIR vs FKBTIBBIR vs CRDTIBBIR vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.