HostTIBBIR vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
TIBBIR (Base) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
TIBBIR vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| TIBBIR | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1183 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $844.65K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $250.87K | $1.69B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 116 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~6,754× the liquidity of TIBBIR
- CCV measures ~3,246× the 24h volume of TIBBIR
What the data says
TIBBIR
TIBBIR — Ribbita — is a token from the Virtuals Protocol ecosystem on Base: one of the agent-launched assets that came out of that platform's agent-economy push. The contract 0xa4a2e2ca3fbfe21aed83471d28b6f65a233c6e00 is what our scan tracks: $251 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 10, 2026.
The honest read on agent-ecosystem tokens: they are doubly levered to the AI-agent narrative — to their own project's delivery and to attention staying inside the Virtuals economy at all. Liquidity is real here, which separates it from the long tail of agent tokens, but the cohort as a whole trades on narrative first and fundamentals later.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TIBBIR or CCV?
By tracked market cap: TIBBIR (Base) measures — and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TIBBIR or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: TIBBIR (Base) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TIBBIR and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show TIBBIR at 0.00% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TIBBIR vs RYYTIBBIR vs FKBTIBBIR vs CRDTIBBIR vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.