HostSWARMS vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
SWARMS (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SWARMS vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SWARMS | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007137 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $6.65M | — |
| 24h volume | $108.24K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $658.90K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $6.65M | — |
| Holders | 28,913 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~2,645× the liquidity of SWARMS
- RDK measures ~26,666× the 24h volume of SWARMS
What the data says
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $6.6 million market cap, $659 thousand of liquidity and 28,913 holders as of September 16, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWARMS or RDK?
By tracked market cap: SWARMS (Solana) measures $6.65M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWARMS or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: SWARMS (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWARMS and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SWARMS at −4.45% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SWARMS vs RYYSWARMS vs FKBSWARMS vs CRDSWARMS vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.