HostSWARMS vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SWARMS (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SWARMS vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SWARMS | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007137 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $6.65M | — |
| 24h volume | $108.24K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $658.90K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $6.65M | — |
| Holders | 28,913 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~3,013× the liquidity of SWARMS
- CRD measures ~37,210× the 24h volume of SWARMS
What the data says
SWARMS
SWARMS is a Solana AI-agent token — themed on multi-agent frameworks, one of the larger survivors of the agent-token wave. The mint 74SBV4zDXxTRgv1pEMoECskKBkZHc2yGPnc7GYVepump is what our scan tracks: $6.6 million market cap, $659 thousand of liquidity and 28,913 holders as of September 16, 2026 — a genuinely deep pool and a very wide holder base for this cap.
The honest caution is the category's: agent-framework tokens are narrative instruments first — the holders are real, the market is real, and the technology they gesture at is real somewhere, but the value linkage between an open framework and its token is loose at best. What the figures do support is that this market is functional, which the long tail of agent tokens cannot claim.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWARMS or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SWARMS (Solana) measures $6.65M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWARMS or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SWARMS (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWARMS and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SWARMS at −4.45% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SWARMS vs RYYSWARMS vs FKBSWARMS vs RDKSWARMS vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.