HostSUSDE vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDE (Ethereum) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SUSDE vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SUSDE | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.24 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $973.42K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $1.11M | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 466 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~2,033× the liquidity of SUSDE
- RYY measures ~3,571× the 24h volume of SUSDE
What the data says
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our September 14, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $1.1 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDE or RYY?
By tracked market cap: SUSDE (Ethereum) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDE or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDE (Ethereum) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDE and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SUSDE at +0.29% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSDE vs FKBSUSDE vs CRDSUSDE vs RDKSUSDE vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.