HostSUSDE vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDE (Ethereum) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
SUSDE vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| SUSDE | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.24 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $973.42K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $1.11M | $1.69B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 466 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~1,526× the liquidity of SUSDE
- CCV measures ~2,816× the 24h volume of SUSDE
What the data says
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our September 14, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $1.1 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDE or CCV?
By tracked market cap: SUSDE (Ethereum) measures — and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDE or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDE (Ethereum) grades B and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDE and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show SUSDE at +0.29% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SUSDE vs RYYSUSDE vs FKBSUSDE vs CRDSUSDE vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.