HostSOLO vs FBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
SOLO (Solana) vs FBTC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
SOLO vs FBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SOLO | FBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7969 | $76.30K |
| Market cap | $7.98M | $10.33M |
| 24h volume | $57.12K | $1.38K |
| Liquidity | $1.60M | $1.50M |
| FDV | $19.56M | $10.33M |
| Holders | 2,781 | 43 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SOLO measures ~41× the 24h volume of FBTC
- SOLO measures ~65× the holder count of FBTC
- over the shared window SOLO moved +20.6% while FBTC moved −0.43%
What the data says
SOLO
SOLO (Solomon) is a small-cap Solana token launched through MetaDAO's futarchy launchpad — the "meta"-suffixed mint SoLo9oxzLDpcq1dpqAgMwgce5WqkRDtNXK7EPnbmeta is the launchpad's signature, meaning its issuance and treasury sit under futarchy governance rather than a founder's multisig. Our September 16, 2026 read shows $8.0 million market cap ($19.6 million fully diluted) against $1.6 million of pool liquidity and 2,781 holders.
The honest note: the market-cap-to-FDV gap — over half the supply isn't circulating — is the thing to watch at this size, and futarchy-governed treasuries are a real governance experiment, not a marketing one. A small float under a launchpad structure means the unlock schedule is the chart.
FBTC
FBTC is FunctionBTC — a Bitcoin yield asset in the "BTC that earns" class alongside LBTC and the liquid-staking tokens, issued under Function's structure for putting Bitcoin into yield-bearing deployment. The mint 3orqhCKM5admbcHkHQhRAEKbXhUT5VPgsQqz7fBa6QdF is the Solana deployment; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.5 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest note for the class: every "productive BTC" claim is a custody decision — the yield source varies (staking, lending, delta-neutral strategies) but the holder always sits behind at least one operator's reserve management. FBTC's A grade covers the Solana-side mint; the yield engine is an off-chain book.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SOLO or FBTC?
By tracked market cap: SOLO (Solana) measures $7.98M and FBTC (Solana) measures $10.33M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SOLO or FBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: SOLO (Solana) grades A and FBTC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SOLO and FBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SOLO at +20.6% and FBTC at −0.43%.
More comparisons
SOLO vs RYYSOLO vs FKBSOLO vs CRDSOLO vs RDKFBTC vs RYYFBTC vs FKBFBTC vs CRDFBTC vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.