HostFBTC vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
FBTC (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FBTC vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FBTC | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $76.30K | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $10.33M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.38K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $1.50M | $2.26B |
| FDV | $10.33M | — |
| Holders | 43 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~1,501× the liquidity of FBTC
- RYY measures ~2,516,951× the 24h volume of FBTC
What the data says
FBTC
FBTC is FunctionBTC — a Bitcoin yield asset in the "BTC that earns" class alongside LBTC and the liquid-staking tokens, issued under Function's structure for putting Bitcoin into yield-bearing deployment. The mint 3orqhCKM5admbcHkHQhRAEKbXhUT5VPgsQqz7fBa6QdF is the Solana deployment; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.5 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest note for the class: every "productive BTC" claim is a custody decision — the yield source varies (staking, lending, delta-neutral strategies) but the holder always sits behind at least one operator's reserve management. FBTC's A grade covers the Solana-side mint; the yield engine is an off-chain book.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FBTC or RYY?
By tracked market cap: FBTC (Solana) measures $10.33M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FBTC or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: FBTC (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FBTC and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FBTC at −0.43% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FBTC vs FKBFBTC vs CRDFBTC vs RDKFBTC vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.