HostSCAM vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
SCAM (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SCAM vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SCAM | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003117 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $2.92M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.28K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $92.68K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $2.92M | — |
| Holders | 2,628 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~23,582× the liquidity of SCAM
- FKB measures ~1,907,934× the 24h volume of SCAM
- over the shared window SCAM moved +22.5% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
SCAM
SCAM — Scamcoin — is a Solana meme whose brand is the joke in the name: a token that calls itself a scam as its entire marketing. The mint 9mNjA6BizTwpvd4DS3o7BjwZ6aPM9DC2jLHS7JFGbonk is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $93 thousand of liquidity and 2,628 holders as of September 16, 2026 — and it wins the scam slug over a smaller sibling named "Scam Altman".
The honest read: irony is a marketing strategy, not a disclaimer — a coin that says it is a scam is still priced on attention and community like every other meme. The brand has kept a real pool and a real holder base alive longer than most straightforward scams, which is either the joke working or the joke being true; the mint above is the only way to tell which asset you hold.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCAM or FKB?
By tracked market cap: SCAM (Solana) measures $2.92M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCAM or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: SCAM (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCAM and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SCAM at +22.5% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SCAM vs RYYSCAM vs CRDSCAM vs RDKSCAM vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.