HostSCAM vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
SCAM (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SCAM vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SCAM | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003117 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $2.92M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.28K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $92.68K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $2.92M | — |
| Holders | 2,628 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~21,419× the liquidity of SCAM
- CRD measures ~3,141,753× the 24h volume of SCAM
- over the shared window SCAM moved +22.5% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
SCAM
SCAM — Scamcoin — is a Solana meme whose brand is the joke in the name: a token that calls itself a scam as its entire marketing. The mint 9mNjA6BizTwpvd4DS3o7BjwZ6aPM9DC2jLHS7JFGbonk is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $93 thousand of liquidity and 2,628 holders as of September 16, 2026 — and it wins the scam slug over a smaller sibling named "Scam Altman".
The honest read: irony is a marketing strategy, not a disclaimer — a coin that says it is a scam is still priced on attention and community like every other meme. The brand has kept a real pool and a real holder base alive longer than most straightforward scams, which is either the joke working or the joke being true; the mint above is the only way to tell which asset you hold.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCAM or CRD?
By tracked market cap: SCAM (Solana) measures $2.92M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCAM or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: SCAM (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCAM and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SCAM at +22.5% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SCAM vs RYYSCAM vs FKBSCAM vs RDKSCAM vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.