HostSAVE vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
SAVE (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SAVE vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SAVE | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2254 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $10.69M | — |
| 24h volume | $419.15 | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $41.79K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $10.69M | — |
| Holders | 954 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~54,001× the liquidity of SAVE
- RYY measures ~8,293,409× the 24h volume of SAVE
- over the shared window SAVE moved +43.1% while RYY moved 0.00%
What the data says
SAVE
Save Finance — SAVE — is the rebrand of Solend, Solana's original major lending protocol: a real DeFi venue with years of history, including the famous 2022 "whale account about to be liquidated" governance episode that became a DAO-governance case study. Mint SAVEaeeqeXNKYb4Lyx28DkUms5gyZ76vGa6fCfdzWfK; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $42 thousand of liquidity and roughly 954 holders.
The honest profile: a genuinely old DeFi protocol — the whale-liquidation drama, the Solend→Save rebrand, the long grind of competing against Kamino-era Solana lending — with a token whose value is governance plus whatever the protocol shares with it. It survived; "survived" and "thrived" are different claims and the TVL tells that story better than the ticker.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SAVE or RYY?
By tracked market cap: SAVE (Solana) measures $10.69M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SAVE or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: SAVE (Solana) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SAVE and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SAVE at +43.1% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SAVE vs FKBSAVE vs CRDSAVE vs RDKSAVE vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.