HostSAVE vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
SAVE (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
SAVE vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| SAVE | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2254 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $10.69M | — |
| 24h volume | $419.15 | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $41.79K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $10.69M | — |
| Holders | 954 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~52,296× the liquidity of SAVE
- FKB measures ~5,835,655× the 24h volume of SAVE
- over the shared window SAVE moved +43.1% while FKB moved 0.00%
What the data says
SAVE
Save Finance — SAVE — is the rebrand of Solend, Solana's original major lending protocol: a real DeFi venue with years of history, including the famous 2022 "whale account about to be liquidated" governance episode that became a DAO-governance case study. Mint SAVEaeeqeXNKYb4Lyx28DkUms5gyZ76vGa6fCfdzWfK; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $42 thousand of liquidity and roughly 954 holders.
The honest profile: a genuinely old DeFi protocol — the whale-liquidation drama, the Solend→Save rebrand, the long grind of competing against Kamino-era Solana lending — with a token whose value is governance plus whatever the protocol shares with it. It survived; "survived" and "thrived" are different claims and the TVL tells that story better than the ticker.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SAVE or FKB?
By tracked market cap: SAVE (Solana) measures $10.69M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SAVE or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: SAVE (Solana) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SAVE and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show SAVE at +43.1% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
SAVE vs RYYSAVE vs CRDSAVE vs RDKSAVE vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.