HostPYTHIA vs GNO — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTHIA (Solana) vs GNO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-28 / 2026-09-27.
PYTHIA vs GNO — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| PYTHIA | GNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002635 | $119.54 |
| Market cap | $2.61M | $315.53M |
| 24h volume | $54.13K | $66.53K |
| Liquidity | $300.33K | $299.79K |
| FDV | $2.61M | $819.10M |
| Holders | 38,310 | 20,216 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~121× the market cap of PYTHIA
- PYTHIA measures ~1.9× the holder count of GNO
What the data says
PYTHIA
PYTHIA is a pump.fun memecoin from the AI-narrative cohort — oracle-of-Delphi branding attached to the AI-agent wave. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $2.6 million across 38,310 wallets on mint CreiuhfwdWCN5mJbMJtA9bBpYQrQF2tCBuZwSPWfpump.
AI-branded memecoins borrow the sector's attention without carrying its product surface — the narrative does the recruiting. The wide wallet base shows the launch found an audience; the cap shows what remains of it.
GNO
There's a lot to like about how GNO's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That leaves GNO at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Market-wise, GNO carries thin liquidity of $299.79K and 20,216 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $315.53M, that $299.79K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 20,216 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of GNO as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTHIA or GNO?
By tracked market cap: PYTHIA (Solana) measures $2.61M and GNO (Ethereum) measures $315.53M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTHIA or GNO?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTHIA (Solana) grades A and GNO (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTHIA and GNO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show PYTHIA at 0.00% and GNO at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PLAY vs PYTHIASHMON vs PYTHIAHNT vs PYTHIAPYTHIA vs ZRPPLAY vs GNOSHMON vs GNOGNO vs ZRPGNO vs MNT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.