HostGNO vs MNT — price, size and safety, side by side
GNO (Ethereum) vs MNT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-28.
GNO vs MNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GNO | MNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119.54 | $0.6719 |
| Market cap | $315.53M | $3.19M |
| 24h volume | $66.53K | $195.53K |
| Liquidity | $299.79K | $295.01K |
| FDV | $819.10M | $3.19M |
| Holders | 20,216 | 701 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~99× the market cap of MNT
- MNT measures ~2.9× the 24h volume of GNO
- GNO measures ~29× the holder count of MNT
What the data says
GNO
There's a lot to like about how GNO's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That leaves GNO at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Market-wise, GNO carries thin liquidity of $299.79K and 20,216 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $315.53M, that $299.79K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 20,216 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of GNO as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
MNT
Mantle's MNT on Solana — the bridged claim on the governance/gas token of the Mantle Ethereum L2 — at mint 4SoQ8UkWfeDH47T56PA53CZCeW4KytYCiU65CwBWoJUt. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $295 thousand of liquidity and roughly 701 holders.
MNT the asset is a real mid-cap L2 token — Mantle runs one of the larger Ethereum rollups, born from the BitDAO treasury, with the token doing gas and governance duty. The Solana version is a bridge claim; the canonical asset is ERC-20 and its real markets are on Mantle/Ethereum/CEXs.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNO or MNT?
By tracked market cap: GNO (Ethereum) measures $315.53M and MNT (Solana) measures $3.19M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNO or MNT?
On the contract checks we publish: GNO (Ethereum) grades A and MNT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNO and MNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GNO at 0.00% and MNT at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PYTHIA vs GNOPLAY vs GNOSHMON vs GNOGNO vs ZRPMNT vs DOGZRP vs MNTMNT vs SCSMNT vs PURPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.