HostPLAY vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PLAY vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PLAY | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0006692 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $3.12M | — |
| 24h volume | $260.79 | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $2.63K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $3.12M | — |
| Holders | 7,667 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~663,686× the liquidity of PLAY
- RDK measures ~11,068,054× the 24h volume of PLAY
- over the shared window PLAY moved −20.0% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY is the token of Play Solana — the project behind a Solana-branded handheld gaming console, one of the chain's more unusual hardware bets. The mint PLAYs3GSSadH2q2JLS7djp7yzeT75NK78XgrE5YLrfq is what our scan tracks: $3.1 million market cap on $2.6 thousand of liquidity with 7,667 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: hardware-plus-token is a legitimately novel model — a console with a native token economy — but the pool figure is the caveat of the batch: twenty-six hundred dollars of public liquidity under a three-million cap means almost all supply is held, not traded. Device pre-order holders and ecosystem allocations dominate; the public market is a sliver.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or RDK?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Solana) measures $3.12M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PLAY at −20.0% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PLAY vs RYYPLAY vs FKBPLAY vs CRDPLAY vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.