HostPLAY vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
PLAY (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PLAY vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PLAY | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0006692 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $3.12M | — |
| 24h volume | $260.79 | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $2.63K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $3.12M | — |
| Holders | 7,667 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~755,954× the liquidity of PLAY
- CRD measures ~15,444,415× the 24h volume of PLAY
- over the shared window PLAY moved −20.0% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
PLAY
PLAY is the token of Play Solana — the project behind a Solana-branded handheld gaming console, one of the chain's more unusual hardware bets. The mint PLAYs3GSSadH2q2JLS7djp7yzeT75NK78XgrE5YLrfq is what our scan tracks: $3.1 million market cap on $2.6 thousand of liquidity with 7,667 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: hardware-plus-token is a legitimately novel model — a console with a native token economy — but the pool figure is the caveat of the batch: twenty-six hundred dollars of public liquidity under a three-million cap means almost all supply is held, not traded. Device pre-order holders and ecosystem allocations dominate; the public market is a sliver.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PLAY or CRD?
By tracked market cap: PLAY (Solana) measures $3.12M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PLAY or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: PLAY (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PLAY and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PLAY at −20.0% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PLAY vs RYYPLAY vs FKBPLAY vs RDKPLAY vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.