HostPEPE vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
PEPE (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PEPE vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PEPE | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000361 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.11M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $27.53M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,243 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~63× the liquidity of PEPE
- RDK measures ~2,591× the 24h volume of PEPE
What the data says
PEPE
PEPE needs no introduction — the 2023 memecoin that ate a season, sitting at the extreme end of the attention-token spectrum alongside DOGE's heirs. The address 0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933 is the canonical mint; our September 8, 2026 snapshot reads $27.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of the token's total depth, which spans every venue that lists it.
The honest framing is the same one every attention asset earns: there is no cashflow, no protocol revenue, and no floor — only the meme's durability, which PEPE has outlasted nearly every competitor from its cohort on. Its distribution is broad enough that the whale-manipulation shape of smaller memes doesn't apply the same way, but "broad" is not "durable."
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PEPE or RDK?
By tracked market cap: PEPE (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PEPE or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: PEPE (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PEPE and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PEPE at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PEPE vs RYYPEPE vs FKBPEPE vs CRDPEPE vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.