HostPEPE vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
PEPE (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
PEPE vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| PEPE | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00000361 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.11M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $27.53M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,243 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~72× the liquidity of PEPE
- CRD measures ~3,615× the 24h volume of PEPE
What the data says
PEPE
PEPE needs no introduction — the 2023 memecoin that ate a season, sitting at the extreme end of the attention-token spectrum alongside DOGE's heirs. The address 0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933 is the canonical mint; our September 8, 2026 snapshot reads $27.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of the token's total depth, which spans every venue that lists it.
The honest framing is the same one every attention asset earns: there is no cashflow, no protocol revenue, and no floor — only the meme's durability, which PEPE has outlasted nearly every competitor from its cohort on. Its distribution is broad enough that the whale-manipulation shape of smaller memes doesn't apply the same way, but "broad" is not "durable."
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PEPE or CRD?
By tracked market cap: PEPE (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PEPE or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: PEPE (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PEPE and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show PEPE at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PEPE vs RYYPEPE vs FKBPEPE vs RDKPEPE vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.