HostOPUS vs HAWK — price, size and safety, side by side
OPUS (Solana) vs HAWK (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
OPUS vs HAWK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| OPUS | HAWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0009896 | $0.0001104 |
| Market cap | $1.07M | $1.07M |
| 24h volume | $1.78K | $125.32 |
| Liquidity | $122.44K | $123.27K |
| FDV | $1.07M | $1.07M |
| Holders | 695 | 9,018 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- OPUS measures ~14× the 24h volume of HAWK
- HAWK measures ~13× the holder count of OPUS
- over the shared window OPUS moved −14.7% while HAWK moved −3.02%
What the data says
OPUS
Opus Genesis — OPUS — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-wave generation (an agent-persona project), at mint Dxg9cLvssqb1WEMpyynjf17kGRc4UTNyUqjzNj99opus. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $122 thousand of liquidity and roughly 695 holders.
The honest number here is 695 holders — a narrow registry under a $122 thousand pool means concentration: a small set of wallets effectively sets the price. Agent-persona economics are attention economics with a product skin.
HAWK
Hawk Tuah — HAWK — the Solana token launched around the viral "Hawk Tuah" personality (the 2024 street-interview meme that became a media brand), at mint HAWKThXRcNL9ZGZKqgUXLm4W8tnRZ7U6MVdEepSutj34. It wins the 'hawk' slug over Hawksight's defunct ticker; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $123 thousand of liquidity and roughly 9,018 holders.
HAWK is crypto-cautionary-tale canon: the launch ran to a huge market cap and collapsed within hours in December 2024 — one of the most famous memecoin blowups ever, spawning actual regulatory attention. What trades now is the residue: a real market ($123 thousand, ~9k holders) on a brand whose peak moment is firmly in the past.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OPUS or HAWK?
By tracked market cap: OPUS (Solana) measures $1.07M and HAWK (Solana) measures $1.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OPUS or HAWK?
On the contract checks we publish: OPUS (Solana) grades B and HAWK (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OPUS and HAWK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show OPUS at −14.7% and HAWK at −3.02%.
More comparisons
OPUS vs RYYOPUS vs FKBOPUS vs CRDOPUS vs RDKHAWK vs RYYHAWK vs FKBHAWK vs CRDHAWK vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.