HostOPUS vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
OPUS (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
OPUS vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| OPUS | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0009896 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $1.07M | — |
| 24h volume | $1.78K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $122.44K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $1.07M | — |
| Holders | 695 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~14,234× the liquidity of OPUS
- RDK measures ~1,625,804× the 24h volume of OPUS
- over the shared window OPUS moved −14.7% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
OPUS
Opus Genesis — OPUS — a Solana AI-agent token from the agent-wave generation (an agent-persona project), at mint Dxg9cLvssqb1WEMpyynjf17kGRc4UTNyUqjzNj99opus. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $122 thousand of liquidity and roughly 695 holders.
The honest number here is 695 holders — a narrow registry under a $122 thousand pool means concentration: a small set of wallets effectively sets the price. Agent-persona economics are attention economics with a product skin.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OPUS or RDK?
By tracked market cap: OPUS (Solana) measures $1.07M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OPUS or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: OPUS (Solana) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OPUS and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show OPUS at −14.7% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
OPUS vs RYYOPUS vs FKBOPUS vs CRDOPUS vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.