HostOMFG vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
OMFG (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
OMFG vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| OMFG | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1481 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $2.37M | — |
| 24h volume | $8.95K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $317.81K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $2.37M | — |
| Holders | 1,707 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~6,246× the liquidity of OMFG
- CRD measures ~450,266× the 24h volume of OMFG
- over the shared window OMFG moved −6.82% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
OMFG
OMFG is the token of Omnipair — a Solana DeFi protocol for generalized asset pairing and leveraged positions, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its vanity mint signals. The mint omfgRBnxHsNJh6YeGbGAmWenNkenzsXyBXm3WDhmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.4 million market cap, $318 thousand of liquidity and 1,707 holders as of September 16, 2026 — an unusually deep pool against a small cap.
The honest shape: a real protocol (Omnipair handles permissionless pair lending on Solana) governed through MetaDAO's futarchy markets — meaning its roadmap is literally decided by prediction markets, which is either the most honest governance model in the corpus or the most volatile one, depending on your read. The concentrated holder count under two thousand is the practical flag beside the excellent liquidity.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OMFG or CRD?
By tracked market cap: OMFG (Solana) measures $2.37M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OMFG or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: OMFG (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OMFG and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show OMFG at −6.82% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
OMFG vs RYYOMFG vs FKBOMFG vs RDKOMFG vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.