HostOMFG vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
OMFG (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
OMFG vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| OMFG | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1461 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $2.37M | — |
| 24h volume | $8.95K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $317.81K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $2.37M | — |
| Holders | 1,707 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~5,331× the liquidity of OMFG
- CCV measures ~306,455× the 24h volume of OMFG
- over the shared window OMFG moved −8.06% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
OMFG
OMFG is the token of Omnipair — a Solana DeFi protocol for generalized asset pairing and leveraged positions, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its vanity mint signals. The mint omfgRBnxHsNJh6YeGbGAmWenNkenzsXyBXm3WDhmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.4 million market cap, $318 thousand of liquidity and 1,707 holders as of September 16, 2026 — an unusually deep pool against a small cap.
The honest shape: a real protocol (Omnipair handles permissionless pair lending on Solana) governed through MetaDAO's futarchy markets — meaning its roadmap is literally decided by prediction markets, which is either the most honest governance model in the corpus or the most volatile one, depending on your read. The concentrated holder count under two thousand is the practical flag beside the excellent liquidity.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OMFG or CCV?
By tracked market cap: OMFG (Solana) measures $2.37M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OMFG or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: OMFG (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OMFG and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show OMFG at −8.06% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
OMFG vs RYYOMFG vs FKBOMFG vs CRDOMFG vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.