HostMORPHO vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
MORPHO (Base) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
MORPHO vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| MORPHO | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.76 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $5.20M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $933.37K | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 636 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~1,867× the liquidity of MORPHO
- RDK measures ~555× the 24h volume of MORPHO
What the data says
MORPHO
MORPHO is the Morpho protocol's token — and Morpho is one of the most-used lending primitives in DeFi: isolated lending markets that other platforms (including Coinbase's cbBTC-backed loans) build on top of rather than competing with. The contract 0xbaa5cc21fd487b8fcc2f632f3f4e8d37262a0842 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $933 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.
The honest shape: MORPHO is a governance-and-alignment token on genuinely deep infrastructure — the protocol's TVL is real, the integrations are real — but the token itself was transfer-restricted at launch and unlocks later, so the float-vs-FDV gap and the token's actual claim on protocol growth are the two numbers to watch. Real product, thin float — that combination cuts both ways.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MORPHO or RDK?
By tracked market cap: MORPHO (Base) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MORPHO or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: MORPHO (Base) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MORPHO and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MORPHO at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MORPHO vs RYYMORPHO vs FKBMORPHO vs CRDMORPHO vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.