Open app

MORPHO vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

MORPHO (Base) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

MORPHOB

$2.76
Morpho Token on Base
Trade MORPHO
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

MORPHO vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
MORPHO 0.00%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
MORPHOCRD
Price$2.76$2.13K
Market cap
24h volume$5.20M$4.03B
Liquidity$933.37K$1.99B
FDV
Holders
Age (days)6361
Safety gradeBB

Where they differ

What the data says

MORPHO

MORPHO is the Morpho protocol's token — and Morpho is one of the most-used lending primitives in DeFi: isolated lending markets that other platforms (including Coinbase's cbBTC-backed loans) build on top of rather than competing with. The contract 0xbaa5cc21fd487b8fcc2f632f3f4e8d37262a0842 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $933 thousand of pool liquidity as of August 24, 2026.

The honest shape: MORPHO is a governance-and-alignment token on genuinely deep infrastructure — the protocol's TVL is real, the integrations are real — but the token itself was transfer-restricted at launch and unlocks later, so the float-vs-FDV gap and the token's actual claim on protocol growth are the two numbers to watch. Real product, thin float — that combination cuts both ways.

Full MORPHO safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, MORPHO or CRD?

By tracked market cap: MORPHO (Base) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, MORPHO or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: MORPHO (Base) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have MORPHO and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show MORPHO at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

MORPHO vs RYYMORPHO vs FKBMORPHO vs RDKMORPHO vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.