HostIOT vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
IOT (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
IOT vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| IOT | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00006975 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $917.30K | — |
| 24h volume | $382.15 | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $307.32 | $1.69B |
| FDV | $917.30K | — |
| Holders | 132,324 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~5,513,164× the liquidity of IOT
- CCV measures ~7,173,452× the 24h volume of IOT
- over the shared window IOT moved −19.3% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
IOT
IOT is the Helium network's IOT-subnetwork token — earned by the LoRaWAN hotspot operators who built out Helium's original sensor network, under the subDAO structure Helium adopted after migrating to Solana in 2023. The September 16, 2026 snapshot records roughly $917 thousand of market capitalization spread across 132,324 holders on mint iotEVVZLEywoTn1QdwNPddxPWszn3zFhEot3MfL9fns — a holder base built by mining rewards, one hotspot at a time, which is why it is so wide relative to the value.
Both authority checks pass in the snapshot: mint revoked, freeze revoked. Nothing in the token's SPL-level configuration can dilute a balance or freeze one, and that is what the 85/100 certifies on the structure side.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IOT or CCV?
By tracked market cap: IOT (Solana) measures $917.30K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IOT or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: IOT (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IOT and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show IOT at −19.3% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
IOT vs RYYIOT vs FKBIOT vs CRDIOT vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.