HostIO vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
IO (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
IO vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| IO | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1296 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $46.71M | — |
| 24h volume | $103.38K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $35.03K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $93.77M | — |
| Holders | 85,565 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~49,750× the liquidity of IO
- RDK measures ~27,922× the 24h volume of IO
- over the shared window IO moved −7.19% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
IO
IO is the token of io.net, the decentralized GPU-compute network that was one of 2024's headline Solana launches. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $46.7 million of circulating market capitalization across 85,565 holders on mint BZLbGTNCSFfoth2GYDtwr7e4imWzpR5jqcUuGEwr646K — with fully diluted value near $93.8 million, meaning over half of eventual supply still sits outside the float on vesting schedules.
That FDV gap is the first thing a buyer should price: emissions and unlocks arrive continuously in a token like this, and today's market cap competes with tomorrow's supply. It is a tokenomics fact, not a contract fault — the contract itself reads clean, with mint and freeze authorities both confirmed revoked in the snapshot.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IO or RDK?
By tracked market cap: IO (Solana) measures $46.71M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IO or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: IO (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IO and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show IO at −7.19% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
IO vs RYYIO vs FKBIO vs CRDIO vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.