Open app

IO vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side

IO (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.

IOA

$0.1296
IO on Solana
Trade IO
vs

CRDB

$2.13K
Cirudu on Base
Trade CRD

IO vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29

100 — shared start
IO −7.19%  ·  CRD 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
IOCRD
Price$0.1296$2.13K
Market cap$46.71M
24h volume$103.38K$4.03B
Liquidity$35.03K$1.99B
FDV$93.77M
Holders85,565
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

IO

IO is the token of io.net, the decentralized GPU-compute network that was one of 2024's headline Solana launches. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $46.7 million of circulating market capitalization across 85,565 holders on mint BZLbGTNCSFfoth2GYDtwr7e4imWzpR5jqcUuGEwr646K — with fully diluted value near $93.8 million, meaning over half of eventual supply still sits outside the float on vesting schedules.

That FDV gap is the first thing a buyer should price: emissions and unlocks arrive continuously in a token like this, and today's market cap competes with tomorrow's supply. It is a tokenomics fact, not a contract fault — the contract itself reads clean, with mint and freeze authorities both confirmed revoked in the snapshot.

Full IO safety read →

CRD

Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.

This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.

Full CRD safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, IO or CRD?

By tracked market cap: IO (Solana) measures $46.71M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, IO or CRD?

On the contract checks we publish: IO (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have IO and CRD performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show IO at −7.19% and CRD at 0.00%.

More comparisons

IO vs RYYIO vs FKBIO vs RDKIO vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.