HostINTCX vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
INTCX (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
INTCX vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| INTCX | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $108.38 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $42.33M | — |
| 24h volume | $73.63K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $28.35K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $42.33M | — |
| Holders | 2,460 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~61,482× the liquidity of INTCX
- RDK measures ~39,202× the 24h volume of INTCX
- over the shared window INTCX moved +8.92% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
INTCX
INTCX is the xStock for Intel — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper carrying a claim on INTC's price on Solana. The mint XshPgPdXFRWB8tP1j82rebb2Q9rPgGX37RuqzohmArM is what our scan tracks: $42.3 million market cap on $28.3 thousand of pool liquidity with 2,460 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The mismatch in those figures is the story: a forty-million-token cap resting on a twenty-thousand-dollar exit door means any real selling pressure goes through the pool price, not through Intel's quote. The custody and after-hours caveats are the family standard. Grade C on our scan reflects exactly this arithmetic — the wrapper is legitimate, the market around it is thin.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INTCX or RDK?
By tracked market cap: INTCX (Solana) measures $42.33M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INTCX or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: INTCX (Solana) grades C and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INTCX and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show INTCX at +8.92% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
INTCX vs RYYINTCX vs FKBINTCX vs CRDINTCX vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.