HostINTCX vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
INTCX (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
INTCX vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| INTCX | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $108.67 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $42.33M | — |
| 24h volume | $73.63K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $28.35K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $42.33M | — |
| Holders | 2,460 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~59,771× the liquidity of INTCX
- CCV measures ~37,231× the 24h volume of INTCX
- over the shared window INTCX moved +9.21% while CCV moved 0.00%
What the data says
INTCX
INTCX is the xStock for Intel — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper carrying a claim on INTC's price on Solana. The mint XshPgPdXFRWB8tP1j82rebb2Q9rPgGX37RuqzohmArM is what our scan tracks: $42.3 million market cap on $28.3 thousand of pool liquidity with 2,460 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The mismatch in those figures is the story: a forty-million-token cap resting on a twenty-thousand-dollar exit door means any real selling pressure goes through the pool price, not through Intel's quote. The custody and after-hours caveats are the family standard. Grade C on our scan reflects exactly this arithmetic — the wrapper is legitimate, the market around it is thin.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INTCX or CCV?
By tracked market cap: INTCX (Solana) measures $42.33M and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INTCX or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: INTCX (Solana) grades C and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INTCX and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show INTCX at +9.21% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
INTCX vs RYYINTCX vs FKBINTCX vs CRDINTCX vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.