HostINTCX vs MUSKIT — price, size and safety, side by side
INTCX (Solana) vs MUSKIT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
INTCX vs MUSKIT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| INTCX | MUSKIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $108.38 | $0.0001273 |
| Market cap | $42.33M | $122.48K |
| 24h volume | $73.63K | $1.42 |
| Liquidity | $28.35K | $27.90K |
| FDV | $42.33M | $122.48K |
| Holders | 2,460 | 52,381 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- INTCX measures ~346× the market cap of MUSKIT
- INTCX measures ~51,700× the 24h volume of MUSKIT
- MUSKIT measures ~21× the holder count of INTCX
- over the shared window INTCX moved +8.92% while MUSKIT moved −6.30%
What the data says
INTCX
INTCX is the xStock for Intel — Backed Finance's tokenized-equity wrapper carrying a claim on INTC's price on Solana. The mint XshPgPdXFRWB8tP1j82rebb2Q9rPgGX37RuqzohmArM is what our scan tracks: $42.3 million market cap on $28.3 thousand of pool liquidity with 2,460 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The mismatch in those figures is the story: a forty-million-token cap resting on a twenty-thousand-dollar exit door means any real selling pressure goes through the pool price, not through Intel's quote. The custody and after-hours caveats are the family standard. Grade C on our scan reflects exactly this arithmetic — the wrapper is legitimate, the market around it is thin.
MUSKIT
MUSKIT — "Musk It" — is a pump.fun memecoin attached to Elon Musk's name and orbit of memes. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $122.5 thousand across 52,381 wallets on mint 9So52ugZh2BLBT3f7p61947q91uQh2DyvbfyMDeRpump.
Elon-adjacent tokens are a whole genre with its own pattern: pump on a post, fade on silence, repeat. The name is a marketing hook, not a claim — this token has no affiliation with Musk, and none should be inferred from the ticker.
FAQ
Which is bigger, INTCX or MUSKIT?
By tracked market cap: INTCX (Solana) measures $42.33M and MUSKIT (Solana) measures $122.48K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, INTCX or MUSKIT?
On the contract checks we publish: INTCX (Solana) grades C and MUSKIT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have INTCX and MUSKIT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show INTCX at +8.92% and MUSKIT at −6.30%.
More comparisons
INTCX vs RYYINTCX vs FKBINTCX vs CRDINTCX vs RDKMUSKIT vs RYYMUSKIT vs FKBMUSKIT vs CRDMUSKIT vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.