HostHUMA vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
HUMA (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
HUMA vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| HUMA | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02432 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $40.84M | — |
| 24h volume | $46.68K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $420.17K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $235.61M | — |
| Holders | 21,959 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~4,148× the liquidity of HUMA
- RDK measures ~61,833× the 24h volume of HUMA
- over the shared window HUMA moved +7.72% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
HUMA
HUMA is Huma Finance's token — a PayFi protocol moving real payment-financing flows (factoring, remittance collateral) on-chain, one of the few RWA-adjacent tokens with a business you can point at. The mint HUMA1821qVDKta3u2ovmfDQeW2fSQouSKE8fkF44wvGw is what our scan tracks: $40.8 million market cap ($235.6 million fully diluted), $420 thousand of pool liquidity, 21,959 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: real financing volume is the claim, and the mcap-to-FDV gap (under a fifth circulating) is the watch-item — unlock schedules decide how much of the business you actually own at this price. Better thesis than most tokens in this tier; same float mechanics as all of them.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HUMA or RDK?
By tracked market cap: HUMA (Solana) measures $40.84M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HUMA or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HUMA and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show HUMA at +7.72% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
HUMA vs RYYHUMA vs FKBHUMA vs CRDHUMA vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.