Open app

HUMA vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side

HUMA (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.

HUMAA

$0.02432
Huma Finance on Solana
Trade HUMA
vs

FKBB

$1.05
Fukabu on Base
Trade FKB

HUMA vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07

100 — shared start
HUMA +7.72%  ·  FKB 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
HUMAFKB
Price$0.02432$1.05
Market cap$40.84M
24h volume$46.68K$2.45B
Liquidity$420.17K$2.19B
FDV$235.61M
Holders21,959
Age (days)1
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

HUMA

HUMA is Huma Finance's token — a PayFi protocol moving real payment-financing flows (factoring, remittance collateral) on-chain, one of the few RWA-adjacent tokens with a business you can point at. The mint HUMA1821qVDKta3u2ovmfDQeW2fSQouSKE8fkF44wvGw is what our scan tracks: $40.8 million market cap ($235.6 million fully diluted), $420 thousand of pool liquidity, 21,959 holders as of September 16, 2026.

The honest read: real financing volume is the claim, and the mcap-to-FDV gap (under a fifth circulating) is the watch-item — unlock schedules decide how much of the business you actually own at this price. Better thesis than most tokens in this tier; same float mechanics as all of them.

Full HUMA safety read →

FKB

Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.

What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.

Full FKB safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, HUMA or FKB?

By tracked market cap: HUMA (Solana) measures $40.84M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, HUMA or FKB?

On the contract checks we publish: HUMA (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have HUMA and FKB performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show HUMA at +7.72% and FKB at 0.00%.

More comparisons

HUMA vs RYYHUMA vs CRDHUMA vs RDKHUMA vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.