HostGST vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GST (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GST vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GST | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001097 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $5.57M | — |
| 24h volume | $25.30K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $32.31K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $5.57M | — |
| Holders | 779,621 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~53,946× the liquidity of GST
- RDK measures ~114,068× the 24h volume of GST
- over the shared window GST moved −6.16% while RDK moved 0.00%
What the data says
GST
GST was the paycheck of the move-to-earn summer. STEPN's 2022 phenomenon paid people tokens for walking and running in NFT sneakers, and GST — the earn-side token, minted to players as rewards, at AFbX8oGjGpmVFywbVouvhQSRmiW2aR1mohfahi4Y2AdB on Solana — was what the app paid out. At the peak, walking earned real money; the economics of paying the whole user base to exercise did what such economics do, and GST's collapse from its 2022 highs became crypto's textbook case of earn-token hyperinflation. What remains, per HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 779,621 holders, about $5.6 million of market capitalization, and $32 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity.
The authority read needs its genre context: GST's mint is not burned, and can't be — an earn token's whole function is being minted to players as rewards, so supply expansion is the product mechanism, governed by the game's emission design rather than a fixed cap. The freeze authority, the check that protects holders, reads revoked. What the mechanism means practically: your position dilutes as long as the game emits faster than its sinks burn, and that balance is a game-design decision made off-chain.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GST or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GST (Solana) measures $5.57M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GST or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GST (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GST and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GST at −6.16% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GST vs RYYGST vs FKBGST vs CRDGST vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.