HostGRT vs IMX — price, size and safety, side by side
GRT (Ethereum) vs IMX (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GRT vs IMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GRT | IMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02869 | $0.1688 |
| Market cap | $313.95M | $148.45M |
| 24h volume | $22.25K | $13.15K |
| Liquidity | $128.33K | $79.27K |
| FDV | $309.90M | $337.58M |
| Holders | 171,927 | 96,984 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~2.1× the market cap of IMX
- GRT measures ~1.6× the liquidity of IMX
- GRT measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of IMX
- GRT measures ~1.8× the holder count of IMX
What the data says
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
IMX
IMX has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now IMX's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 67/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, IMX shows thin liquidity of $79.27K and 96,984 holders as of 2026-09-27. The number worth sitting with is that $79.27K of depth against a market cap of about $148.45M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IMX reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. The 96,984-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IMX as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GRT or IMX?
By tracked market cap: GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M and IMX (Ethereum) measures $148.45M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GRT or IMX?
On the contract checks we publish: GRT (Ethereum) grades C and IMX (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GRT and IMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GRT at 0.00% and IMX at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITATPM vs IMXIMX vs ZBCNSLX vs IMXIMX vs DUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.