HostGNO vs NES — price, size and safety, side by side
GNO (Ethereum) vs NES (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNO vs NES — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GNO | NES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119.54 | $0.0005341 |
| Market cap | $315.53M | $75.57K |
| 24h volume | $66.53K | $71.64 |
| Liquidity | $299.79K | $264.63K |
| FDV | $819.10M | $111.63K |
| Holders | 20,216 | 28,890 |
| Age (days) | — | 50 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~4,175× the market cap of NES
- GNO measures ~929× the 24h volume of NES
What the data says
GNO
There's a lot to like about how GNO's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That leaves GNO at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Market-wise, GNO carries thin liquidity of $299.79K and 20,216 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $315.53M, that $299.79K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 20,216 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of GNO as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
NES
Nesa (NES) is an AI-inference network token — a small-cap bet on decentralized model serving — at contract 0x230f1e241c621d5af670dad83ebcdd18971e2995. Our September 27, 2026 read shows $265 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AI-inference is a crowded thesis, and the differentiator is never the name — it is whether real inference volume settles through the network and whether the token captures any of it. At this size, treat the claim as unproven until the usage numbers say otherwise.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNO or NES?
By tracked market cap: GNO (Ethereum) measures $315.53M and NES (Ethereum) measures $75.57K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNO or NES?
On the contract checks we publish: GNO (Ethereum) grades A and NES (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNO and NES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GNO at 0.00% and NES at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PYTHIA vs GNOPLAY vs GNOSHMON vs GNOGNO vs ZRPNES vs MEBTGMON vs NESNES vs CLAWINJ vs NES
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.