HostGNO vs APE — price, size and safety, side by side
GNO (Ethereum) vs APE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GNO vs APE — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| GNO | APE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $119.54 | $0.1584 |
| Market cap | $315.53M | $158.40M |
| 24h volume | $66.53K | $90.78K |
| Liquidity | $299.79K | $270.24K |
| FDV | $819.10M | $158.40M |
| Holders | 20,216 | 189,466 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- GNO measures ~2.0× the market cap of APE
- APE measures ~9.4× the holder count of GNO
What the data says
GNO
There's a lot to like about how GNO's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and balances can't be frozen or blacklisted, so you stay in control of your own tokens. That leaves GNO at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with only normal market risk left to price in.
Market-wise, GNO carries thin liquidity of $299.79K and 20,216 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $315.53M, that $299.79K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. 20,216 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of GNO as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
APE
APE passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with the structural risks already off the table.
Looking at the market data, APE shows a $270.24K pool and a holder base of 189,466 as of 2026-09-27. Set the $270.24K pool against roughly $158.40M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 189,466-wallet holder base is a genuine strength on top of that: distribution that broad is hard to manufacture, and it means no single wallet quietly owns the float. Reassuringly, the wallet that created APE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GNO or APE?
By tracked market cap: GNO (Ethereum) measures $315.53M and APE (Ethereum) measures $158.40M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GNO or APE?
On the contract checks we publish: GNO (Ethereum) grades A and APE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GNO and APE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show GNO at 0.00% and APE at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PYTHIA vs GNOPLAY vs GNOSHMON vs GNOGNO vs ZRPUSDUC vs APEMYX vs APEBERN vs APEAPE vs BTR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.