HostGHO vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Monad) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHO vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHO | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9984 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $200.80K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $3.99M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 77 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~437× the liquidity of GHO
- RDK measures ~14,375× the 24h volume of GHO
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's answer to the question every lending market eventually asks: why should our own stablecoin pay someone else? Deposited collateral on Aave mints GHO against it, interest on GHO borrows flows back to Aave's DAO rather than a stablecoin issuer, and the peg is held by arbitrage against the lending market rather than a redemption window. The deployment at 0xfc421ad3c883bf9e7c4f42de845c4e4405799e73 is on Monad — new territory for a token that lives or dies by integration depth, and one of the first assets our index tracks there.
Our September 16, 2026 snapshot shows $4.0 million of tracked pool liquidity — real depth for a chain this young. The honest caveat: a stablecoin's worth is its peg history plus the health of the lending market behind it, and on a new chain both are short records so far. Our snapshot also did not assess this deployment's contract-level controls — the live scan is the check for that.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or RDK?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Monad) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Monad) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHO at −0.14% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHO vs RYYGHO vs FKBGHO vs CRDGHO vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.