HostGHO vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Monad) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
GHO vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| GHO | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9984 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $200.80K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $3.99M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 77 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~548× the liquidity of GHO
- FKB measures ~12,181× the 24h volume of GHO
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's answer to the question every lending market eventually asks: why should our own stablecoin pay someone else? Deposited collateral on Aave mints GHO against it, interest on GHO borrows flows back to Aave's DAO rather than a stablecoin issuer, and the peg is held by arbitrage against the lending market rather than a redemption window. The deployment at 0xfc421ad3c883bf9e7c4f42de845c4e4405799e73 is on Monad — new territory for a token that lives or dies by integration depth, and one of the first assets our index tracks there.
Our September 16, 2026 snapshot shows $4.0 million of tracked pool liquidity — real depth for a chain this young. The honest caveat: a stablecoin's worth is its peg history plus the health of the lending market behind it, and on a new chain both are short records so far. Our snapshot also did not assess this deployment's contract-level controls — the live scan is the check for that.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or FKB?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Monad) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Monad) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show GHO at −0.14% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
GHO vs RYYGHO vs CRDGHO vs RDKGHO vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.