HostFWA vs SUSDE — price, size and safety, side by side
FWA (Ethereum) vs SUSDE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FWA vs SUSDE — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FWA | SUSDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0271 | $1.24 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.66M | $973.42K |
| Liquidity | $1.13M | $1.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 32 | 466 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FWA measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of SUSDE
What the data says
FWA
There's a small gap on this page — FWA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-08-17. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
By the numbers, FWA is showing deep liquidity of $1.13M and 32 days old as of 2026-08-17. Treat $1.13M as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price.
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our September 14, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $1.1 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FWA or SUSDE?
By tracked market cap: FWA (Ethereum) measures — and SUSDE (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FWA or SUSDE?
On the contract checks we publish: FWA (Ethereum) grades B and SUSDE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FWA and SUSDE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FWA at 0.00% and SUSDE at +0.29%.
More comparisons
FWA vs RYYFWA vs FKBFWA vs CRDFWA vs RDKSUSDE vs RYYSUSDE vs FKBSUSDE vs CRDSUSDE vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.