HostFUSE vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
FUSE (Ethereum) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FUSE vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FUSE | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003135 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $326.08K | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 4 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~6,921× the liquidity of FUSE
- RYY measures ~2,241× the 24h volume of FUSE
What the data says
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUSE or RYY?
By tracked market cap: FUSE (Ethereum) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUSE or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: FUSE (Ethereum) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUSE and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FUSE at 0.00% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FUSE vs FKBFUSE vs CRDFUSE vs RDKFUSE vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.