HostFUSE vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
FUSE (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FUSE vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FUSE | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003135 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.55M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $326.08K | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 4 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~5,345× the liquidity of FUSE
- RDK measures ~1,861× the 24h volume of FUSE
What the data says
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FUSE or RDK?
By tracked market cap: FUSE (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FUSE or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: FUSE (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FUSE and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FUSE at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FUSE vs RYYFUSE vs FKBFUSE vs CRDFUSE vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.