HostFOLD vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
FOLD (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FOLD vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FOLD | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09333 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.18M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $1.99M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 52 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~877× the liquidity of FOLD
- RDK measures ~1,326× the 24h volume of FOLD
What the data says
FOLD
Interfold (FOLD) is a small-cap token in the MEV-infrastructure family — the lineage runs back through Manifold Finance, a team that built validator-facing orderflow tooling on Ethereum. The contract 0xe172e9b6cfbeeb5593bdce3f077356fdb33af904 is the deployment our scan tracks; the August 31, 2026 read shows $2.0 million of pool liquidity.
The honest framing at this size: the thesis is niche infrastructure exposure, the float is thin, and the difference between a real market and a wide spread can be a single wallet. Small-issuer rules apply in full — verify the team's current product surface before assuming the token accrues anything.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FOLD or RDK?
By tracked market cap: FOLD (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FOLD or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: FOLD (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FOLD and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FOLD at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FOLD vs RYYFOLD vs FKBFOLD vs CRDFOLD vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.